01 / Editorial mandate
Make the estimate—and its uncertainty—legible.
A billionaire list looks precise because it uses numbers. The underlying evidence rarely is. Public share prices move, private companies lack a continuous market value, liabilities may be undisclosed, and family or sovereign assets can be confused with personal property. Our role is to make those distinctions visible.
The publication covers annual individual rankings, geographic and industry directories, individual profiles, collective family fortunes, historical estimates, fictional comparisons and investigative records. These collections answer different questions, use different evidence standards and are never combined into one aggregate ranking.
A reported number is not the same as an independently supported finding. Every material value should be accompanied by a source, a relevant date and an explanation of what the number represents.
Other Billionaires is currently an independent, unincorporated editorial project. Legal publisher details will be added following incorporation.
02 / The annual ranking
A provisional reference, not a real-time scoreboard.
The current index preserves the Forbes World’s Billionaires 2026 as a dated external reference, valued on March 1, 2026. Other Billionaires does not independently produce those annual valuations, and does not present them as independently verified.
The importer for this edition is frozen while source use and the publication’s own valuation methodology are reviewed. Production pages use a validated, checked-in snapshot rather than requesting a live third-party feed. No further automated synchronization will run during that review.
View the external reference editionOne frozen external reference
The current index contains 3,428 people from Forbes’s World’s Billionaires 2026, valued on March 1, 2026. It is retained as a dated provisional reference while the source use and our own valuation methodology are under review; it is not an independently calculated Other Billionaires valuation.
Provisional source rank stays intact
A person’s global annual rank is preserved from the source edition during the review. We do not silently replace it with a live market value or a later news estimate.
Category ranks are recalculated
Country, region, industry, type, gender, age and wealth-band pages are ordered by the same provisional annual net-worth field. Ties use competition ranking: equal values share a position and the following position advances accordingly.
Unresolved fields are omitted
Founder, investor, philanthropy and principal-ownership classifications use source fields, deterministic rules and documented exceptions. If the evidence does not support a classification, the record is left unassessed rather than guessed.
It should not be read as residence unless a page explicitly says otherwise.
A sum of external-reference estimates from the same dated snapshot, not cash on hand or an independently verified total.
Provisional source-derived classification used for filtering; it does not describe every asset.
Numbered ranks and qualified records
Current annual positions are provisional source ranks. Some subjects merit a research profile but do not qualify for any numbered position. These records display NR, meaning “not ranked.” A reported or unverified figure does not determine its placement and does not enter numbered ranks, verified counts, aggregate wealth totals or structured net-worth data.
The same separation applies to profile depth. Existing researched profiles may contain holdings, timelines, claims and multiple citations. Source-based directory profiles contain the annual fields, methodology and source needed to understand the listing; they do not imply a complete asset investigation.
03 / Research collections
Different kinds of wealth require different rules.
Personal net worth, family wealth, controlled assets and institutional assets are not interchangeable. Special collections remain separate from the annual individual ranking and from one another.
Collective family fortunes
Family estimates describe wealth associated with a dynasty or ownership group. They are not automatically divisible among relatives, and they are never assigned to one person without evidence of beneficial ownership.
Open collection →52 InvestigationsUnmeasured and disputed fortunes
These unranked profiles separate personal property from collective holdings, sovereign assets, foundation assets, historical extraction, proxy claims and assets that are merely controlled.
Open collection →50 Historical recordsFortunes across time
Historical figures are an archive, not a precise cross-era league table. Nominal wealth, inflation-adjusted values, territorial control and shares of economic output are not directly interchangeable.
Open collection →4 Fictional recordsPublished fictional estimates
Third-party entertainment estimates support the displayed values. Canonical-universe material establishes the character and assets described, but it does not independently validate a dollar figure.
Open collection →Reading rules
- Company market value, revenue and assets under management are not personal net worth.
- Sovereign funds, state property, foundations, trusts and client assets are excluded unless beneficial ownership is established.
- Ownership percentages, private-company values, liabilities and pledged shares are included only when supportable.
- Family and individual figures are not added together without a documented allocation method.
- A reported range is not ranked at its midpoint.
- Omission from a ranking does not prove that a subject lacks substantial wealth.
04 / Evidence framework
Four separate signals—not one catch-all label.
Valuation status, investigative status, claim findings and confidence answer different questions. A strong source can support ownership while still being insufficient to establish a precise personal net worth.
Valuation status
How well the displayed amount and date are supported.
- Provisional external reference
- A dated value from an external annual edition retained during source and methodology review. It is not an independently calculated Other Billionaires valuation.
- Supported estimate
- A reputable source supports the displayed amount and relevant date. Supported does not mean audited, exact or permanent.
- Qualified estimate
- Evidence supports a related, shared, rounded, dated or control-based figure, but not an unrestricted verified ranking value.
- Source pending
- The archive preserves an existing amount or position, but a matching valuation source and date have not been established. It is excluded from verified totals and structured net-worth data.
Investigative status
What the reviewed evidence establishes about the subject.
- Substantiated
- Independent evidence supports the relevant private or collective wealth finding.
- Qualified
- Substantial wealth is evidenced, but attribution, timing or division among owners remains limited.
- Control
- The subject oversees major assets whose beneficial ownership is not established.
- Historical
- The evidence concerns past wealth, extraction, freezing, forfeiture or recovery—not present-day net worth.
- Disputed
- Credible sources conflict, or the claim depends on incomplete, indirect or proxy evidence.
- Unproven
- Billionaire status has not been established from the evidence reviewed.
Claim finding records whether one specific statement is supported, qualified, contradicted, unverified or not established.
Confidence reflects source quality, recency and completeness. It never turns a qualified or disputed estimate into a verified one.
All 26 family records have claim-level findings for their material valuation, ownership and wealth-source claims. All 52 investigations carry row-level sources, dates and limitations; three currently have full claim ledgers. The remaining investigative ledgers will be expanded as research is completed.
05 / Sources and dates
Evidence is useful only when readers can trace it.
The research collections currently link to 119 distinct public source URLs. We prioritize evidence according to what a source can establish—not simply how often a claim has been repeated.
- 01
Primary public records
Government, court, exchange and regulatory filings, audited accounts and legally significant transaction records.
- 02
Ownership disclosures
Company reports, shareholder disclosures, transaction documents and other first-party records that establish a specific fact.
- 03
Established reporting
Forbes, Bloomberg, Reuters, the Financial Times, the Associated Press and comparably established financial or news publications.
- 04
Authoritative scholarship
Academic work and recognized historical references appropriate to the period or subject.
- 05
Attributed background
Official company, family or subject material may provide context, but self-description alone does not establish a net-worth claim.
Unattributed aggregators, SEO listicles and repeated claims without a traceable basis are not accepted as valuation evidence. Promotional or self-published material may be retained only as clearly attributed background and should not be the sole support for a net-worth claim.
How to read dates
- Valuation date
- The date at which the estimate or underlying assets were valued.
- Publication date
- The date a cited source published the relevant estimate or finding.
- Editorial review date
- The date the editorial desk last reassessed the record; it is not necessarily a new valuation.
- Access date
- The date a source was retrieved for the research record.
06 / Corrections and updates
Corrections are evidence decisions.
A well-documented correction may change a factual statement, valuation status, claim finding, confidence level, limitation or source list. A request alone does not determine the outcome.
Annual ranking
Updated when a complete new annual edition is acquired, normalized and validated. Historical annual values are not overwritten merely because markets later move.
Profiles and citations
Reviewed on a rolling basis as stronger public records, ownership disclosures or reputable reporting become available.
Families and investigations
Reassessed when evidence materially changes ownership attribution, valuation status, confidence or the limitations of a claim.
Submit a correction
Show us the exact claim and the stronger source.
Include the affected URL, the statement or figure in question, and a dated public source that supports the proposed change.
07 / Editorial standards
Attribution is not endorsement.
Other Billionaires is not presented as the official website of any person, family, company, government, foundation or publication it covers. Linking to or citing a source does not imply partnership, approval or endorsement.
Widely repeated claims still require a traceable source, date and defensible relationship to the subject.
Influence, office, management or political power is not treated as beneficial ownership without evidence.
Material limitations and conflicts in the public record are stated rather than hidden behind a single precise number.
Subjects and representatives may submit evidence, but editorial findings are assessed against the same published standards.
A material personal, family, business, legal or financial relationship that could reasonably affect coverage should be disclosed on the relevant record. Readers can report a potential undisclosed conflict to the editorial desk for review. Read the full editorial governance policy for the publication’s source hierarchy, conflict review and correction standards.
08 / Limitations
Net worth is an estimate, not a bank balance.
None of the figures on this site should be read as an audited personal balance sheet unless a cited document explicitly provides one. Private-company values, beneficial ownership, debts, trusts, currency conversion and market prices can be incomplete or change materially.
- Annual values describe one historical market snapshot and will differ from later real-time estimates.
- A person may own assets that have not been publicly disclosed; absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
- Family, sovereign, foundation, historical and fictional values should not be compared directly with annual individual net worth.
- Inclusion in an investigative directory does not establish billionaire status, wrongdoing or beneficial ownership.
- Evidence status can change when stronger, newer or contradictory documentation becomes available.
Read the ranking with the source open.